Latest update 13.08.2019 Category: Biography

Adolf Eichmann and the Identification of Modern Evil. essay

The escape of Adolf Eichmann Completely on

This obviously played into the hands of Eichmann and others like him. As the Russians advanced in the east and the Allies in the west, Ecihmann left Auschwitz and took on the disguise of a German Luftwaffe corporal. The ‘corporal’ was caught by the Americans at Ulm in southern Germany. They knew he was not a Luftwaffe corporal by the SS tattoo on his arm. Eichmann admitted that he was a junior SS lieutenant called Otto Eckmann. However, in the chaos and confusion of the time, ‘Eckmann’ was considered to be a minor figure and he was sent to a camp that was poorly guarded. Eichmann escaped from this camp in February 1946. He took on the disguise of ‘Otto Henninger’, a Bavarian businessman.

Choose country Completely on

If the State or society is regarded as the originator of law, then there can be no such thing as absolute authority. For example, in Hitler’s Third Reich, the evil laws had ‘validity’ simply because they had been ‘posited’ by the government of the day. However, according to the Bible, the originator of law is God. Firstly, His role as Creator gives Him the right to be Lawgiver. ‘Says God’ is thus the comprehensive answer to all those who oppose any restraint on their amoral behaviour by demanding to know ‘Says who?’29 Secondly, all of God’s laws for human behaviour are in the best interests of humanity to obey. Thirdly, seeing God is transcendental to this world, His moral code transcends national prejudices, situation ethics, and human favours. It is universal, objective and has absolute authority because it emanates from God Himself, and in particular from His unchanging holy character.

Banality of Evil and Adolf Eichmann Essay Completely on

experiment where no one obeyed."On how Milgram's study coincided with the trial of Nazi officer Adolf Eichmannand how the experiment reinforced what Hannah Arendt described as "the banality of evil""The Eichmann trial was a televised trial and it did reintroduce the whole idea of the Holocaust to a new American public. And Milgram very much, I think, believed that Hannah Arendt's view of Eichmann as a cog in a bureaucratic machine was something that was just as applicable to Americans in New

Eichmann, the Banality of Evil, and Thinking in Arendt's Thought Essay Completely on

- Good versus evil is an eternal struggle, conflict, war, or a unification. Good exists while evil does as well, this is because without evil, there can be no such thing as good, and without good, there can also be no evil. The question exists that if there is an all-good & powerful God who is omniscient; omnipotent; omni-benevolent; then how can evil exist within such absolute terms. Evil has plagued the lives of all creatures and has existed throughout all of time. The problem of evil is that since God created the world and is all omniscient; omnipotent; and omni-benevolent, and since a good thing strives to rid evil; and because there are no limits to an omnipotent being: then because God i... [tags: God, Good and evil, Evil, Problem of evil]

Two Interrogations, Gina Haspel and Adolf Eichmann Completely on

Haspel testified that while she can’t say what exactly might constitute an immoral order in the past, her “moral compass” would not allow her to obey one today, given the “stricter moral standard” she says “we have chosen to hold ourselves to.” She does not judge the actions that she and her colleagues took in the years after 9-11, “in that tumultuous time” of decidedly looser moral standards: “I’m not going to sit here, with the benefit of hindsight, and judge the very good people who made hard decisions.” She testified that she supports laws that prohibit torture, but insists that such laws were not in place at the time and that such “harsh interrogations” were allowable under the legal guidance the CIA had at the time and “that the highest legal authority in the United States had approved it, and that the president of the United States had approved it.”

Banality of Evil and Adolf Eichmann Essay Completely on

- Eichmann, the Banality of Evil, and Thinking in Arendt's Thought* ABSTRACT: I analyze the ways in which the faculty of thinking can avoid evil action, taking into account Hannah Arendt's discussion regarding the banality of evil and thoughtlessness in connection with the Eichmann trial. I focus on the following question posed by Arendt: "Could the activity of thinking as such, the habit of examining and reflecting upon whatever happens to come to pass, regardless of specific content and quite independent of results, could this activity be of such a nature that it 'conditions' men against evildoing?" Examples of the connection between evildoing and thinking include the distinction between... [tags: Thinking Eichmann Banality Essays]

The Lies of Adolf Eichmann Completely on

I think we miss the point, though, when we talk only about anti-Semitism and Europe. I believe modern anti-Semitism is a symptom of a much bigger problem today, because we have forgotten its origins: The anti-Semitism of the Nazis was, above all, a disbelief in human equality! The Nazis were convinced that our world is too small for us, that we don’t have enough resources, that some humans are superior to others, and that only those humans have the right to survive—and the obligation to kill those who don’t. For them, the Jews symbolized internationalism, rationalism, globalism, and universal moral standards. The ideology is tough to decipher, and hence incredibly dangerous. And if you ask me, their thinking still persists—specifically, the conviction to be better than others and to have more rights. We are buildings walls around our “Western World”; we try to suppress or influence the democratic and economic development of other countries, and we preach that freedom, equality, and liberty are sometimes not as important as national security, national pride, religion, or our laws. Strength comes from our ability to navigate our world as it is, not from destroying what we don’t understand.

Choose country Completely on

During these discussions, Eichmann confirmed that he had been brought up in the Evangelische Church (p. 34), but said that he did not believe that Jesus died to save sinners (p. 37). He said he found God through nature (p. 35) and through what the philosophers wrote (p. 83). He said that the Old Testament was “nothing but Jewish stories and fables” (p. 23), and that he had no use for the New Testament (p. 30). He did not believe in hell (p. 24) or Satan (p. 86), and he did not believe that anyone needed a Saviour (pp. 132–33, 140). He declared, “I have nothing to confess”, “I have no sin”, and “I have no regrets” (p. 83). Other subjects raised by Eichmann included Buddhism, and the beliefs of Kant, Planck, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Spinoza.